Martin Rabinovitz v. Honorable Federico Pena, Secretary of Transportation, United States Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an adverse employment action does not include an employer’s denial of overtime where such benefit was purely discretionary and not automatically entitled
• holding that an employer’s denial of a purely discretionary benefit is not an adverse employment action
• holding that an adverse employment action does not include an employer's denial of overtime where such benefit was purely discretionary and not automatically entitled
• holding that a “loss of a bonus is not an adverse employment action in a case such as this where the employee is not automatically entitled to the bonus”
• holding that a “loss of a bonus is not an adverse employment action in a case such as this where the employee is not automatically entitled to the bonus”
• commenting that while negative evaluations are not enough to alone to constitute adverse action, if plaintiff “had been, as she alleges, put on probation, we might have a different case before us”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).