Skip to main content
· 4/20/2022

MARTIN MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a CLEVELAND CLINIC MARTIN HEALTH v. VINCENT GORHAM, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the plaintiff's need for discovery was moot where the underlying litigation had been settled
  • finding that documents in possession of attorney general, relating to investigation of police officers, were not protected from disclosure under investigatory materials exemption to Public Records Act, where investigations into police misconduct had been concluded
  • recognizing, under public records law, “public interest in disclosing allegations of official misconduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.