Martin Meehan v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a glove with the defendant’s DNA somewhere on it that was found at a crime scene was sufficient evidence by itself to convict the defendant of burglary
• holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction for burglary
• holding that, pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 9(F)(5
• affirming a burglary conviction based on a glove found at a crime scene containing the defendant’s DNA
• evidence a jury could infer guilt from is sufficient for a conviction
• burglary conviction affirmed on extremely small quantum of circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).