Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FEHA and the regulations promulgated under it “provide[d] a means to determine ‘reasonable accommodation’ without reference to the CBA”
• holding that employee’s disability claim did not require interpretation of the CBA where the CBA was “silent regarding the ways that management may either restructure positions to modify workload or design special arrangements ... to accommodate employees”
• holding the FEHA standard “provide[d] a means to determine ‘reasonable accommodation’ without reference to the CBA”
• “Mobil’s potential defenses are also relevant to the preemption analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).