Martin, J. & A., Pets v. Bailey, A. & D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the majority opinion was not, as the concurring opinion suggested, “dismiss[ing] decades of extensive social science research” regarding the reliability of eyewitness identification (alteration in original)
• “Findings cannot be clearly erroneous if there is any competent material evidence to 9 support the factual findings of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).