Martin-Glover Co. v. Mays

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying enhancement where defendant asked participant to run an errand for him and to set up a drug transaction
• approving of the trial court’s admission of English-translation transcripts as substantive evidence, along with the Spanish-language recordings
• “manager or supervisor” enhancement supported by proof of one other participant running an errand for defendant who “set up the final transaction but did not handle the drugs himself” and the inference that others also acted at his direction
• “We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision not to play the tapes in full for the jury. The tapes were lengthy and the conversations were conducted in a language [i.e., Spanish] that most or all of the jury did not understand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).