Martin E. Grossman v. James McDonough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In light of the overwhelming physical and testimonial proof, we cannot say the [error] had a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.”
• “[W]e have had occasion to say more than once that the Brecht standard governs harmless error analysis in habeas corpus cases involving [Confrontation Clause] transgressions associated with the improper admission of out-of- court statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).