Martin Cordova, Maritere v. Baez Rivera, Eudaldo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that Montana has broader privacy protections in search and seizure jurisprudence, and U.S. Supreme Court law is “not determinative” of whether a government action constitutes a search
• noting that assessment of an expectation of privacy depends on various factors
• explaining that “[w]hat a person 48 knowingly exposes to the public is not protected, but what an individual seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” (internal quotations omitted)
• explaining that “[w]hat a person 48 knowingly exposes to the public is not protected, but what an individual seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” (internal quotations omitted)
• stating that we look to “various factors”
• stating that we look to “various factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).