· 1/18/1996
MARTIN BY MARTIN v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
Citations
- 661 N.E.2d 352
- 169 Ill. 2d 234
- 214 Ill. Dec. 498
- 54 A.L.R. 5th 765
- 1996 Ill. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[Plrescribing physicians ... are in the best position to [take precautions] concerning the dangers associated with prescription drugs.\
- invoking prima facie negligence standard, but also requiring consideration of legislative intent where cause of action was based on federal regulation rather than state statute or ordinance
- invoking prima facie negligence standard, but also requiring consideration of legislative intent where cause of action was based on federal regulation rather than state statute or ordinance
- “[P]re-scribing physicians, and not pharmaceutical manufacturers, are in the best position to provide direct warnings to patients concerning the dangers associated with prescription drugs.”
- affirming summary judgment in favor of drug manufacturer where the plaintiffs sought “to premise a private cause of action in State court upon defendant’s alleged violation of [FDA regulations].”
- invoking prima facie negligence standard, but also requiring consideration of legislative intent where cause of action was based on federal regulation rather than state statute or ordinance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heiple, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.