Skip to main content
· 1/18/1996

MARTIN BY MARTIN v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

Citations

  • 661 N.E.2d 352
  • 169 Ill. 2d 234
  • 214 Ill. Dec. 498
  • 54 A.L.R. 5th 765
  • 1996 Ill. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[Plrescribing physicians ... are in the best position to [take precautions] concerning the dangers associated with prescription drugs.\
  • invoking prima facie negligence standard, but also requiring consideration of legislative intent where cause of action was based on federal regulation rather than state statute or ordinance
  • invoking prima facie negligence standard, but also requiring consideration of legislative intent where cause of action was based on federal regulation rather than state statute or ordinance
  • “[P]re-scribing physicians, and not pharmaceutical manufacturers, are in the best position to provide direct warnings to patients concerning the dangers associated with prescription drugs.”
  • affirming summary judgment in favor of drug manufacturer where the plaintiffs sought “to premise a private cause of action in State court upon defendant’s alleged violation of [FDA regulations].”
  • invoking prima facie negligence standard, but also requiring consideration of legislative intent where cause of action was based on federal regulation rather than state statute or ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiple, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.