MARTIN-ARGAW v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]ny alleged inconsistencies in the evidence and issues of [the witnesses’] credibility were for the jury, not this Court, to resolve; and the jury obviously resolved those issues against [the defendant].”
• “[A]ny alleged inconsistencies in the evidence and issues of [the witnesses’] credibility were for the jury, not this Court, to resolve; and the jury obviously resolved those issues against [the defendant].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).