Martin Angel Ruiz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court may choose only one of the four discrete options provided in section 908.11(4) when revoking a deferred judgment
• holding that, after a probation violation, the district court may choose one of the four options in section 908.11(4): “(1) continue probation with or without altering the terms; (2) continue probation, but hold the defendant in contempt and impose a jail term; (3
• providing that court can, where an improper or illegal sentence is severable from the valid portion of the sentence, vacate just the invalid part but “[w]e are not required to do so and may remand for resentencing”
• finding that impropriety of sentence imposed as disposition of probation- revocation proceeding necessitated reversal of the revocation of a deferred judgment and a remand to “fashion an appropriate consequence within the 7 authorized range of choices provided in section 908.11(4
• noting the court’s discretion to remand for resentencing, even when sentences are severable, and concluding it is appropriate to do so upon reversal of part of an “interconnected” sentence
• noting our discretion to remand for resentencing, even when sentences are severable, and concluding it is appropriate to do so upon reversal of part of a combined sentencing arrangement viewed “as an interconnected package”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).