· 3/23/2007

Martin Alpert and Carolyn Alpert v. United States

Citations

481 F.3d 404
359 B.R. 309
99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1788
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6758
2007 WL 858825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that affiant's “statement . . . based upon his ‘belief’ . . . did not demonstrate the personal knowledge required by” Rule 56

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Gibbons, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.