Martha K. Wayt Trust v. City of Cumming

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence as to the value of stream mitigation credits was irrelevant and inadmissible
• evidence as to the value of stream mitigation credits was irrelevant and inadmissible
• court found that the proffer did not demonstrate a sufficient foundation for Wayt to give a lay opinion on the cost to build the bridge, because it did not show that Wayt had a sufficient opportunity to form a correct opinion on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).