Skip to main content
· 6/11/1981

Martha JEWETT v. INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CORPORATION, Appellant

Citations

  • 653 F.2d 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in failure-to-promote context that plaintiff failed to make out prima facie case because person who was promoted had “superior qualifications”
  • allegation that practice of intentional sex discrimination disadvantaged plaintiff in her opportunity for training and thus continued to disadvantage her in promotion states a continuing violation
  • “Suits may be brought by victims of one or more discriminatory acts occurring before the limitations period, so long as the plaintiff establishes that the offending practice is an ongoing one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz, Aldi-Sert, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.