Martha Hughes v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that NCAA's \no-draft\ and \no-agent\ rules do not have an anticompetitive impact on a discernable market
• “[T]he no-draft rule and other like NCAA regulations preserve the bright line of demarcation between college and ‘pay for play’ football.”
• “[W]e need not reach the merits of whether the no-draft rule is a ‘material term of employment’ as the dissent argues because Banks has failed to allege how the no-draft and no-agent rules are restraints of trade....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).