· 12/31/2019

Martens v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 5423

Syllabus

The insurance contract's definition of \occupying\ was ambiguous as it was susceptible to multiple interpretations. Appellant was \occupying\ a vehicle in order to be provided coverage because he was within geographic proximity to the vehicle and he had a sufficient relationship with the vehicle.

Judges: Singer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.