Skip to main content
· 1/15/1962

Martel v. Old Heidelberg Restaurant

Citations

  • 138 So. 2d 335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Pennsylvania law continues to recognize the maxim that when a contract is executed under seal, a party may not raise a lack or want of consideration as a defense except where there is fraud”
  • “review[ing] the history of the enforcement of restrictive covenants in Pennsylvania to determine the precise nature of the consideration required to support them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.