Martel v. Montana Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, without analysis of specificity requirement, that regulation using word “practical” or “practicable” was appropriate for negligenee-per-se instruction
• holding, without analysis of specificity requirement, that regulation using word \practical\ or \practicable\ was appropriate for negligence-per-se instruction
• “Montana juries can and should be trusted with the information about the consequences of their verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).