Martel Food Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a “breezeway” was a “building” but emphasizing that the breezeway at issue was “mostly enclosed,” rather than the sort of “roofed open-air passage” that the term ordinarily refers to
• “[W]hen a term is defined by statute, we look to the statutory definition to ascertain the plain meaning of the term[.]”
• “Entry into any part of a building in which people reside at night is entry into a dwelling under ORS 164.205(2).”
• “Entry into any part of a building in which people reside at night is entry into a dwelling under ORS 164.205(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).