Martegani v. Cirrus Design Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reducing proposed 28 percent contingency fee by 30 percent, due to lack of contemporaneous time records
• “a court must evaluate whether the proposed settlement is ‘fair and reasonable and in the infant plaintiff’s best interests.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• T.H. v. New York City Department of Education
  S.D. New York· 2015-01-14· cited 7×
• Frommert v. Conkright
  W.D. New York· 2016-12-12· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hensley v. Eckerhart
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
• Cruz v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
  Second Circuit· 1994-08-25· cited 346×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,547 Arthur Newman v. Howard M. Stein, and Morrie Benson and Rose Lerman, Objectants-Appellants
  Second Circuit· 1972-06-29· cited 268×
• Maria Difilippo and Raina Difilippo, by Her Mother and Next Friend Maria Difilippo, Cross-Appellees v. Tullio Morizio, Cross-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1985-04-05· cited 186×
• Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Assoc. v. County of Albany
  Second Circuit· 2007-07-12· cited 110×
• Francine M. Neilson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate Palmolive S.A. De C.V.
  Second Circuit· 1999-12-02· cited 76×
• In re the Accounting of Kaiser
  New York Surrogate's Court· 1950-10-23· cited 49×
• Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.
  S.D. New York· 1994-04-01· cited 19×
• Edionwe v. Hussain
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-05-24· cited 13×
• White v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-12-02· cited 5×