Marteg Corp. v. ZONING BD. OF REVIEW, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• abutting property owners likely could have intervened in zoning board appeal if intervention had been timely
• because of potential of prejudice to parties, person seeking to intervene after judgment has especially heavy burden
• because of potential of prejudice to parties, person seeking to intervene after judgment has especially heavy burden
• \[T]he [unjoined party] cannot claim that their interests are being inadequately represented since this `inadequate representation' was caused by the conscious choice they made when they decided not to intervene.\
• \timeliness is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial justice\
• setting out a similar test for intervention under Rule 24(a)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).