Skip to main content

Marsingill v. O'MALLEY

Citations

  • 58 P.3d 495
  • 2002 Alas. LEXIS 163
  • 2002 WL 31630459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that such evidence could be brought out in cross-examination or rebuttal to counteract “affirmative defense evidence introduced to show a special degree of skill, knowledge, or relevant expertise”
  • requiring expert testimony on the existence, nature, and likelihood of the risk to establish the material risks
  • requiring expert testimony on the existence, nature, and likelihood of the risk to establish the material risks
  • “[C]ourts generally disfavor admission of evidence showing that a defendant failed board certification tests when that evidence is affirmatively offered to prove lack of professional knowledge or skill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Bryner, Carpeneti, Eastaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.