Marshall v. West Point Pepperell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an anti-nepotism statute is rationally related to the government interests of avoiding conflicts of interest and favoritism
• “Where fundamental rights are not substantially burdened the regulation will be upheld unless there is no rational basis for its enactment.”
• \Where fundamental rights are not substantially burdened the regulation will be upheld unless there is no rational basis for its enactment.\
• substantive due process and equal protection
• substantive due process and equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).