Marshall v. University of Hawai'i

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff may pursue a claim for invasion of privacy in circuit court
• affirming summary judgment on count alleging interference with prospective contractual relations because the plaintiff did not suffer injury
• dismissing employee’s claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress alleged against employer
• conduct must be “wilful and wanton”
• adopting Ninth Circuit’s holding in Courtney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).