Marshall v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• change in legal theory does not prevent relation back if factual situation remains the same
• “[T]here was no relation back [in Barnes] where the original complaint alleged fraud in the sale of stock to plaintiff and the amended complaint alleged fraud in defendant’s application for a registration exemption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).