Marshall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here there is no conflict in the evidence as to a witness’s participation in a crime, or where his participation therein is conceded, the question whether the witness is an accomplice is one of law for the trial judge to determine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-12· cited 30×
• State v. Baumgartner
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 8×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Earl v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-02-23· cited 93×
• Brizendine v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1982-01-27· cited 3×