Marshall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although indictment alleged that defendant shoplifted a \set of sheets\ from store and evidence only supported conclusion that he took one sheet, \there was no [variation of] necessary fact\
• although indictment alleged that defendant shoplifted a “set of sheets” from store and evidence only supported conclusion that he took one sheet, “there was no [variation of] necessary fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Davis
  California Supreme Court· 1998-11-05· cited 129×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-07-13· cited 2×
• In the Interest of M. M.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-02· cited 2×
• In Re Mm
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Humphrey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-04-17· cited 267×
• De Palma v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1969-09-08· cited 211×
• Bethay v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-10-21· cited 171×
• Bell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1971-07-09· cited 122×
• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-02-15· cited 79×
• Strickland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-05-20· cited 13×
• Hamby v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1948-02-21· cited 11×