Marshall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that trial counsel’s decision not to object to hearsay testimony may constitute a strategic decision
• counsel's decision not to object to witnesses' recorded statements because of inconsistencies was reasonable trial strategy and counsel's performance was not deficient
• no prejudice where the effect of the challenged statements “was merely cumulative of other undisputed evidence”
• counsel’s decision not to object to witnesses’ recorded statements because of inconsistencies was reasonable trial strategy and counsel’s performance was not deficient
• no prejudice where the effect of the challenged statements “was merely cumulative of other undisputed evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Koonce v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-04-29· cited 24×
• Richards v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-09-09· cited 14×
• Moulder v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-08-21· cited 13×
• SMITH v. THE STATE (Three Cases)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-10-21· cited 12×
• Spell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-05-20· cited 6×
• State v. Darrell Reed Shelnutt
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-10-04

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Malcolm v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
• Romer v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-07-01· cited 233×
• Wesley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 208×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-09-10· cited 77×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-21· cited 31×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-08· cited 14×