Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 923 A.2d 143
  • 174 Md. App. 572
  • 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • while defense counsel was able to present evidence that two other suspects with possible motive and opportunity were developed by police, trial court did not err in excluding documentary evidence supporting theory because both suspects had alibis and theory was too speculative and tenuous
  • court did not abuse discretion in admitting transcript of recording prepared by the Detective assigned to the case, where the court instructed the jury that the transcript was only an aid to assist the jury, but the jury was required to determine the content of the recording

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.