Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 759 N.E.2d 665
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 2131
  • 2001 WL 1587875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the State failed to provide defendant with necessary DNA discovery despite repeated continuances
  • noting CCS entries and pleadings \consistently attribute ... delays to the State's failure to provide discovery\
  • charging a delay to the State where the State filed a motion for continuance due to the State's inability to comply with the defendant's discovery request
  • charging a delay to the State where the State filed a motion for continuance due to the State’s inability to comply with the defendant’s discovery request
  • reversing denial of motion for discharge after finding delay caused by defendant’s motion for continuance, which was based on State’s failure to respond to defendant’s discovery request, was “not chargeable to” defendant for 4(C) purposes
  • not attributing to defendant delay caused by pendency of State’s DNA test results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Darden, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.