Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 915 So. 2d 264
  • 2005 WL 3299368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause is limited on its face to criminal proceedings and does not apply to civil commitment proceedings, such as civil commitment proceedings under the Ryce Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.