Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 439 So. 2d 973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that curative instruction dissipated any prejudice stemming from lab technician's testimony that defendant's fingerprints matched a set of fingerprints taken from a master file of persons booked in county jail
  • holding that curative instruction corrected any prejudice created by testimony that the defendant’s fingerprints matched the fingerprints taken from the files of a person who had previously been booked at the jail
  • curative instruction sufficient to dissipate any prejudicial effect caused by laboratory technician’s comment indicating that defendant had been arrested on a previous occasion
  • curative instruction sufficient to overcome implication of previous arrest in lab technician's testimony on matching defendant's fingerprints with those in the master file of persons previously booked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Nesbitt, and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.