· 2/1/1996
Marshall v. Reno
Citations
- 915 F. Supp. 426
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1380
- 1996 WL 54492
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a Ninth Amendment Bivens claim because “the Ninth Amendment does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
- rejecting a Ninth Amendment Bivens claim because “the Ninth Amendment does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
- rejecting the plaintiff’s Ninth Amendment Bivens claim because “the Ninth Amendment does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
- dismissing Ninth Amendment claim because it “does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
- dismissing Ninth Amendment claim because it “does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
- “[T]he Due -5- Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not itself give rise to a protected interest in being confined in the general prison population.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles R. Richey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.