Skip to main content
· 2/1/1996

Marshall v. Reno

Citations

  • 915 F. Supp. 426
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1380
  • 1996 WL 54492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a Ninth Amendment Bivens claim because “the Ninth Amendment does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
  • rejecting a Ninth Amendment Bivens claim because “the Ninth Amendment does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
  • rejecting the plaintiff’s Ninth Amendment Bivens claim because “the Ninth Amendment does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
  • dismissing Ninth Amendment claim because it “does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
  • dismissing Ninth Amendment claim because it “does not set forth any particular guarantees, but is merely a rule of construction”
  • “[T]he Due -5- Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not itself give rise to a protected interest in being confined in the general prison population.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles R. Richey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.