Marshall v. Quinn-L Equities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the record lacked competent summary judgment evidence that the law firm had direct communications with investors or potential investors
• holding as a matter of law that § 27.01 is inapplicable to the plaintiffs’ transactions because the plaintiffs purchased limited partnership interests, not real estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).