Skip to main content
· 1/31/2002

Marshall v. Priess

Citations

  • 99 S.W.3d 150
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 648
  • 2002 WL 122509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that question of jurisdiction, the court’s authority to act, is an issue of law we review de novo
  • holding the entry of QDRO is not subject to statute of limitations on enforcement of judgments
  • treating a COAP as it would a QDRO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wanda McKee Fowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.