Marshall v. Patzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stipulated damages were “unconscionable under the circumstances” and unenforceable because the non-breaching party suffered no loss
• holding that liquidated damages were “unconscionable” when there was no showing of losses as a result of breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).