Marshall v. Osborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant’s intoxication through his blood-alcohol test and expert testimony
• holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant's intoxication through his blood alcohol test and expert testimony
• permitting expert testimony that a BAC of 0.320 would “have a profound effect on [decedent’s] perception, judgment, and physical abilities”
• “Evidence of a plaintiff’s intoxication is relevant to the extent that it affects the care that he takes for his own safety ***.”
• “Evidence of a plaintiff’s intoxication is relevant to the extent that it affects the care that he takes for his own safety ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).