Marshall v. Northern Virginia Transp. Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “when the primary purpose of an enactment is to raise revenue, the enactment will be considered a tax, regardless of the name attached to the act.”
• holding that a statute was an unconstitutional delegation of taxing power
• holding that a statute was an unconstitutional delegation of taxing power
• applying provisions of Article IV, Section 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).