Marshall v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the subsection “does not define emancipation” but that “it terminates the parental obligation of support as a matter of law whether or not the court enters a finding of emancipation”
• trial court stating: “I lived at home til I was twenty-six (26) and ... I don’t know when I became emancipated.”
• “[I]f he moves out and keeps his own place, I think he clearly is emancipated.”
• “Well, I based on what I heard before, he’s not emancipated. He had the job, he was working, he was making some money. I don’t think the evidence shows he was emancipated at all.”
• interpreting former version of statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carpenter v. Carpenter
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-07-31· cited 32×
• Marriage of Sutton v. Sutton
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-06· cited 28×
• Annette (Oliver) Hirsch v. Roger Lee Oliver
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2012-06-29· cited 27×
• Connell v. Welty
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-27· cited 23×
• Frazier v. Frazier
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-11-15· cited 21×
• Cure v. Cure
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-14· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stitle v. Stitle
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1964-03-24· cited 41×
• Brancheau v. Weddle
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-06-28· cited 31×
• Martin v. Martin
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-07-15· cited 26×
• Moody v. Moody
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-01-24· cited 22×
• Thiele v. Thiele
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-06-24· cited 14×
• Donegan v. Donegan
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-02-17· cited 10×
• In Re Marriage of Seeba
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-07-23· cited 2×