Marshall v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court must both inform the alleged contem-nor that punishment may be imposed to vindicate the dignity of the court, and make findings of fact, supported by evidence, that the contemnor's conduct constitutes misbehavior offensive to the authority and dignity of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Razatos
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-20· cited 43×
• Spabile v. Hunt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1976-06-01· cited 32×
• People v. Lockhart
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-06· cited 21×
• Marshall v. Marshall
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-06-21· cited 19×
• In Re Marriage of Weisbart
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1977-03-03· cited 15×
• Lobb v. Hodges
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1982-02-04· cited 13×
• Catron v. Catron
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-03-23· cited 12×
• Steele v. Steele
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-10-28· cited 11×
• In Re Marriage of Peper
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-08-12· cited 10×
• MCI Constructors, Inc. v. District Court of Pueblo County
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-10-15· cited 6×
• In re the Marriage of Leverett
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-04-26· cited 5×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re People in the Interest of Murley
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1951-12-24· cited 29×