Marshall v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Newsham’s holding that California’s anti-SLAPP statute does apply in federal court post-Shady Grove
• “[T]he majority opinion [in Shady Grove] broke little new ground with respect to the 23 standard for assessing a potential conflict between the federal rules and state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).