Marshall v. Lonberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting this reasoning in Brown and Waite and holding that confinement of an insanity acquittee under the D.C.Code is not based on any punitive considerations
• rejecting this reasoning in Brown and Waite and holding that confinement of an insanity acquittee under the D.C.Code is not based on any punitive considerations
• ipse dixit assertion that presumption of continuing dangerousness and mental illness \is both reasonable and valid.\
• ipse dixit assertion that presumption of continuing dangerousness and mental illness “is both reasonable and valid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Patrick W. Hanigan
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-07-19· cited 54×
• Frank J. Ostrofe v. H. S. Crocker Company, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-03-08· cited 53×
• Carpenters Local Union No. 1846 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-11-04· cited 33×
• Benham v. Edwards
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-05-27· cited 14×
• In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Anchor Hocking Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-09-13· cited 12×
• Carpenters Local Union No. 1846 Of The United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-01-05· cited 11×
• Robert Mata v. George W. Sumner, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-01-20· cited 10×
• In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. Texas· 1982-11-30· cited 8×
• Solinger v. a & M RECORDS, INC.
  N.D. California· 1982-05-11· cited 3×
• Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc.
  D. Idaho· 1982-05-21· cited 2×
• Anchor Hocking Corp. v. St. Joe Container Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-09-13· cited 1×