Skip to main content
· 4/20/2012

Marshall v. I-Flow, LLC

Citations

  • 856 F. Supp. 2d 104
  • 2012 WL 1372103
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • transferring pain pump litigation from D.C. to New York where neither party had a connection to D.C. besides the manufacturer’s general business here
  • making provisional finding of general jurisdiction over defendant that, among other things, devoted an entire sales region to the District of Columbia and sold products to every major hospital in the District of Columbia
  • making provisional finding of general jurisdiction over defendant that, among other things, devoted an entire sales region to the District of Columbia and sold products to every major hospital in the District of Columbia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.