Marshall v. Green Giant Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a bill of lading with ambiguous liability-limitation provisions should be construed against the carrier
• holding that restowage at intermediate ports is customary in the maritime industry and therefore does not constitute a deviation from the contract of carnage
• holding that a bill of lading with ambiguous liability-limitation provisions should be construed against the carrier
• holding that a bill of lading with ambiguous liability-limitation provisions should be construed against the carrier
• \We agree with our sister circuits that the doctrine of quasi-deviation should not be viewed expansively in the post-COGSA era.\
• “We agree with our sister circuits that the doctrine of quasi-deviation should not be viewed expansively in the post-COGSA era.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).