Marshall v. Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a veteran was entitled to receive the difference “between the pay and benefits” he actually earned in his lower-grade Federal position and those he would have earned had an agency not violated his VEOA rights by failing to select him for a higher-grade position
• finding that a veteran was entitled to receive the difference “between the pay and benefits” he actually earned in his lower-grade Federal position and those he would have earned had an agency not violated his VEOA rights by failing to select him for a higher-grade position
• finding a veteran entitled to lost wages or benefits from the date of the selection that violated his veterans’ preference rights until he was placed in, or declined, the position at issue
• finding a veteran entitled to lost wages or benefits from the date of the selection that violated his veterans’ preference rights until he was placed in, or declined, the position at issue
• “[R]econstruction may be an appropriate way to comply in situations where it is unknown whether a veteran would have been selected for a position. ”
• “[R]econstruction does not allow an agency to conduct a new selection process under new circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).