Skip to main content
· 9/3/1895

Marshall v. Creel

Citations

  • 44 S.C. 484
  • 22 S.E. 597
  • 1895 S.C. LEXIS 99

Syllabus

<p>1. Exceptions alleging error to the Circuit Judge in finding that $216 was due, in not finding that the debt was paid, and in not dismissing the.complaint and ordering bond aDd mortgage to be cancelled, are too general to require consideration.</p> <p>2. Findings op Fact by the Circuit Judge sustained and approved.</p> <p>3. In Decree op Foreclosure oi'a mortgage held by a partnership, the partners being plaintiffs, there was no error in decreeing that “should the plaintiffs, or any of them, become the purchaser, the master do make title to him or them upon the payment of the costs and disbursements.”</p>

Judges: Chiee, Moiver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.