Marshall v. Bristol Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there was no reason to determine whether Younger abstention applied to claim that is patently without merit
• noting that Younger is “not a jurisdictional bar” but is instead a “prudential limitation” on the court’s exercise of properly-held jurisdiction
• “Younger is not a jurisdictional bar based on Article III requirements, but instead a prudential limitation on the court’s exercise of jurisdiction . . . .” (quoting Spargo v. N.Y. State Comm'n on Jud. Conduct, 351 F.3d 65, 74 (2d Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).