Marshall v. Bramer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying F.R.E. 201 as a guideline in affirming a trial court taking judicial notice when ruling on a pretrial discovery motion
• applying F.R.E. 201 as a guideline in affirming a trial court’s taking judicial notice when ruling on a pretrial discovery motion
• distinguishing cases cited by party in support of refusal to comply with subpoena duces tecum as those cited cases upheld the right of an organization “to keep its membership list secure from forced disclosure by [the] government”
• distinguishing between cases in which “the government seek[s] to obtain and publicize a list of names” and those in which “a private litigant seek[s] to view a list for the purpose of deposing individuals who may have relevant information”
• “Here, it is not a question of the government seeking to obtain and publicize a list of names, but of a private litigant seeking to view a list for the purpose of deposing individuals who may have relevant information about a pending case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).