Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he language of all cases must be taken and understood in light of the facts of the case in which the language was employed.\
• § 10(c) applied when claimant's employment was intermittent and discontinuous
• § 10(c) applied when claimant’s employment was intermittent and discontinuous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).