· 3/13/2000
Marshall T. Stewart, Jr. And Isiah Williams v. William Henderson, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Citations
- 207 F.3d 374
- 54 Fed. R. Serv. 163
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3721
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 517
- 2000 WL 267522
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that court is not a “superpersonnel department that reexamines an entity’s business decision and reviews the propriety of the decision”
- “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was ac- curate, wise, or well-considered.”
- “The focus of a pretéxt inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise or well-considered.”
- “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise or well-considered.”
- “The focus of a pretext inquiry 13 is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise, or 14 well-considered.”
- “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise, or well-considered.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.