Skip to main content
· 3/13/2000

Marshall T. Stewart, Jr. And Isiah Williams v. William Henderson, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 207 F.3d 374
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 163
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3721
  • 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 517
  • 2000 WL 267522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that court is not a “superpersonnel department that reexamines an entity’s business decision and reviews the propriety of the decision”
  • “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was ac- curate, wise, or well-considered.”
  • “The focus of a pretéxt inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise or well-considered.”
  • “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise or well-considered.”
  • “The focus of a pretext inquiry 13 is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise, or 14 well-considered.”
  • “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise, or well-considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.